My bad

I owe the Bushies a slight apology. It appears that their proposal for classified evidence does allow defense attorneys to see that evidence, but not the accused themselves. That's only a tiny improvement, though... how do you work with your client to defend against "evidence" that you can't ask your client about in the first place? This only partly mitigates my first objection (and even then, does nothing for my complaint about the doublespeak of Sen. Cornyn), and doesn't at all address my second concern.

So a slight mea culpa, a small retraction on my part. Unlike many powerful political leaders, I think it's good to fess up when the facts prove me wrong.