Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Oh, brother...
Strange name, you say? Ethnic, perhaps? Maybe out of the Bible or classical mythology? Solve the mystery for yourself by trying it out at the link above... or just highlight the space between the two brackets below:In 1999, there were only eight newborn American girls named Nevaeh. Last year, it was the 70th-most-popular name for baby girls, ahead of Sara, Vanessa and Amanda.
The spectacular rise of Nevaeh (commonly pronounced nah-VAY-uh) has little precedent, name experts say. They watched it break into the top 1,000 of girls' names in 2001 at No. 266, the third-highest debut ever. Four years later it cracked the top 100 with 4,457 newborn Nevaehs, having made the fastest climb among all names in more than a century, the entire period for which the Social Security Administration has such records.
["Nevaeh" is nothing more than "Heaven" spelled backwards. Woo-hoo. Apparently some Christian rocker named his kid that back in '00, and everyone and her sister thought it was sooooooo very clever! Dan Brown, calling Dan Brown!]
Hope you're as inspired as I am. ;)
Monday, May 15, 2006
How do you spell "baccalaureate?"
Since we had a guest preacher yesterday morning at our normal Sunday services, there's no new sermon on the podcast for that, but I've posted the baccalaureate sermon for your edification.
Saturday, May 13, 2006
Be a bluesman... you know you want to!
Friday, May 12, 2006
"...creator of Heaven and Earth"
Arrrrgh!
Keep your phone records private
Podcast update
Now podcasting to an audio player near you...
Podcasting is essentially the same as blogging, only with an audio file instead of written words. Lots of people are creating their own "radio" programs online by sitting themselves and a few friends down in front of a microphone, and loading the files up to the Web for all to hear. Just like it's possible to subscribe to blogs like mine, and get each new update delivered to you, it's also easy to subscribe to a podcast. In fact, the word comes from (duh!) iPods, which have been a favorite way to snatch new podcasts up as they come and listen to them on the go.
It's a natural fit for me, actually. I've been posting my sermons online in manuscript form for some time now, and have even excerpted teasers from them to post here on the blog from time to time. Why not make recordings of the sermons available, too? And if they're going to be online, why not use an easy distribution method to get them "out there" in a format many people are already using?
If you don't have the tools to subscribe to my sermon podcasts, you can always view them at http://odeo.com/channel/101968/view. They'll appear as a special blog page there that has a built-in audio player for you to click on. I'll also try to post them here in the blog at the same time as they go online with the official podcast.
Why the sudden enthusiasm for podcasting? It's simply, actually - I haven't been recording my sermons previously, but now I am. I discovered that it's a lot more fun to preach "in the moment" from notes, rather than from a fully composed manuscript. I spend so much more time looking at my people, and I really enjoy not knowing precisely how things are going to "turn out." I know the general contours of my sermon well, but letting the specific words come as they may each time I deliver the sermon is exciting.
Problem has been that I'd have no written recored to post that way. (It's silly to me to write out a full manuscript and then just memorize it, except for a few very specific occasions.) Without a secretary that I'd feel right asking to transcribe my sermons for me, it just didn't work well.
I've since picked up a decent digital voice recorder, which not only allows me to easily capture my sermons, but to upload them to my computer and play them back as slow as .5 speed, making it much easier to transcribe them myself. And if I'm already going that far, it's hardly any more effort to podcast the sermons once I'm done transcribing them.
So, here's the first one. It was preached at the St. Rose Care Center in Lamoure at chapel, so it's a little different delivery than I'm used to giving (particularly in speaking rather loudly so everyone can hear). You can post comments here, or go to the podcast page and post your comments there for others to read.
Enjoy, and let me know what you think!
Thursday, May 11, 2006
Just how deep is this rabbit hole, anyway?
In fact, "it's the largest database ever assembled in the world," according to one of USA Today's sources with first-hand knowledge of the program. Shortly after the September 11 attacks, it seems that the feds leaned hard on the major phone companies, insisting that it was their patriotic duty to hand over their internal records of their customers' dialing habits. Only Qwest had the integrity to insist on a warrant, an explicit authorization from the FISA court, or even a letter of authorization from the attorney general's office.
The FSA's response? "They told (Qwest) they didn't want to do that because FISA might not agree with them," according to one source, whose account was confirmed by another.
So, let's recap:
- After the September 11 attacks, the Bush White House secretly began at least two domestic surveillance programs, by an executive order, with no oversight by Congress. (Many more such programs may, in fact, be underway - simply because we don't know of their existance yet doesn't mean that they aren't being conducted. I'd argue that it's highly likely that more shady programs are going to be outed before the air is finally cleared of this stink.)
- Three years later, the president assures the public that "nothing has
changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists,
we're talking about getting a court order before we do so." - The NY Times almost blows the cover off Bush's to tap calls going to and from the United States (without a warrant or court order), but sits on the story until after the November 2005 election at the administration's request. The paper finally breaks the story in December.
- During hearings last month before the House Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales dodges a question about the administration's authority to monitor domestic phone traffic without first getting a warrant - although he knows for a fact that such a program has been ongoing for several years, he responds abiguously: "I wouldn't rule it out."
- Today we discover that the president's fervent desire is to monitor every American who happens to use a telephone, without a warrant, and without even acknowledging that the surveillance is occuring. This despite his earlier insistance that surveillance is only for the "bad guys" in al Qaeda, and certainly not widely deployed.
And no one in the Bush administration thought this information was the least bit important for you to know.
That loud splat you hear? That's your civil liberties dying in a pulpy squish somewhere much farther down the depths of this hole. But we won't see that nasty mess for a while yet - there's still much more dark, dirty rabbit hole to tumble through.
Wednesday, May 03, 2006
What's she worth to you?
Obviously, it's impossible to put a dollar figure on the worth of a human being, but Salary.com's Mom Salary Wizard gives an eye-opening breakdown of the jobs moms do at home, the hours they invest in them, and what someone doing that type of work outside the home might expect to be compensated for all her effort.
There isn't any more important work than raising well the generations that come after us. Thank goodness there are women - and men, too - who can look beyond the financial sacrifices of parenting to see the tremendous good they are doing, for their children and for all of us.

